Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Neighborliness

Hi. I'm back. No explanations. Go figure.

We were treated to two snowstorms last week in the space of just over three days. The first was a fast mover which left a foot high calling card. The second was nastier and left two calling cards - about eight inches of snow, soon to be capped by ice. Lots of fun and a great opportunity to share some chili and watch the Patriots win #14. Not bad for a weekend.

So with #1 I'm getting ready to go out and start shoveling. I see my neighbor is having his driveway plowed and wondered if the plow would hit the corner of his stone wall or my mailbox - again.

I shovel about a 10' square up top and then go down to the road to say hello to the hard packed snow and salt, compliments of the town plows. If I don't get to it fairly quickly successive runs by the plows can build up rapidly and then it all compresses and morphs into the dreaded white cement.

My neighbors are out shoveling their remnants.

I call across: "Are we having fun yet?"

Peter calls back: "Oh yeah, how about you?"

I chant back: "Definitely, and it looks like I'm going to have a lot more fun than you."

We both giggle mirthfully, and I start working towards breakthrough - that's how I like to do it. I identify the highest reach of the plow spew, start digging in a straight line towards the road and then declare breakthrough! when I get to the road. Then I start going in random patterns east and west. That's the system. But the pace is definitely guided by not rushing. It'll get done when it gets done and it's always a grand opportuity to listen to the snow falling, saying hello to my body and the satisfaction of doing something concrete.

Peter mosies over and asks: "Want some help?"

I take my time in responding and say: "I pretty much have it covered, but as long as you're here we could work on this part together and talk in between."

We continue at a leisurely pace sprinkling many breaks in between. Actually the shoveling is brief and the breaks are fairly long.

"Here's how I figure it." I say. The whole system started to break down when there was a rush to get things done - fast." "And now that I know that I take my own sweet time, but keep working at it, bit by bit. Sweat's good, difficult is good, discomfort is good, but having to get it all done chop chop quick quick like yesterday is not only not good, it's bad (except for certain circumscribed events.)"

Peter agrees. Now I know I'm on a roll.

(Magically insert another conversation with another friend, Jeff.)

Over breakfast, my treat this time, I ask: "When do you think it all changed, all this speeding up stuff?"

He says: "Easy; it changed the day fax machines became available for the home-office. Then you never got away from it and it also created an expectation of urgency where you had to deal with it right away and get back to the sender."

"I generally agree. I first saw it when I saw the marketing material for the Digital Rainbow. It showed a guy dressed casually and sitting on his back deck overlooking the ocean and the dunes on the Cape. He had his feet up and had the keyboard on his lap and the monitor on a table a few feet off to the side. I fell for it hook, line, and sinker. I didn't realize how much of a big mouth bass I was until after I bought it and found out that it did nothing to bring me closer to leisure and refreshment."

"Then later I looked at that original marketing material and finally saw the big computer box discretely tucked away behind a planter and all the cables also blended into the background so to be nearly invisible."

I asked Jeff: "So what did you do with your fax machine?""

I loved his answer: "I just tell people that when they send material to him, he will deal with it and get back to them but not to expect anything close to immediacy."

I ask: "How does that work for you?"

"Nicely," he says, "they know that I will deal with it and that's all they really need."

I say: "Good for you! You've managed to create a work structure that works for you, you have trained them and those who can't handle that can move on, and you have reclaimed your life. Neat!"

(Now back to the snow pile.)

Peter and I continued to shovel and talk. We talked about how in the old days and in "the country" people helped one another out. When you needed some assistance they would be there for you, no questions asked. The unspoken contract was that it would be reciprocated, but each person was expected to carry their own weight and make honest effort to work it out by yourself (and with your family) first. That built the bond of trust and made for good neighbors. That built bonds. That built community. And that's what we need now more than ever before.

The next day I brought him some of my not so famous chili (the short version is that I love it but my wife said that we have to get rid of it and that it's in my best interest if I never try making it again...little does she know) and a copy of Duane Elgin's Radical Simplicity for future snowstorms.

9 comments:

Unknown said...

Dear Tim,

The fax machine? Naah. It began with the Xerox machine. No, I mean the Univac machine. Wait, no, I mean the telephone. The telegraph. The Pony Express. The carrier pigeon. The tom-tom.

Oh hell, it began when they invented the wheel.

Sincerely,

John

John J. Xenakis
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://GenerationalDynamics.com

Dougald Hine said...

Hi Tim,

Welcome back! Your conversation with Jeff, and John's comment, triggered a line of thought which became a blog post of its own.

And while I remember, thank you for recommending Cormac McCarthy's 'The Road'. I read it weeks ago and it's still reverberating in my head. Besides the sheer power of it as a novel, I'm struck by the ways people are reading it in relation to climate change and the kind of subjects you discuss here.

Good to see you posting again! Have a great Christmas.

Dougald

Tim Hodgens said...

John - thanks for visiting and I totally agree.

Dougald: thanks for the very kind word. I looked at your most recent post and left a comment of my own. Excellent post. I am salivating over your opportunity to go to the Illich conference.

Tim

Anonymous said...

Hi...I'll be back as well...but in the mean time have a wonderful Christmas and Happy New Year!

I loved your post because it goes to the very nature of getting to know people again...I can't remember the last time someone took the time to slow down and have a friendly conversation..including me!

K

Dancingfarmer said...

I noticed it most when people had to start carrying beepers---then cell phones. Not saying other things didn't contribute or start us down that dirty road---but those two "inventions" have made it impossible to just sit anymore. Those who carry phones now continually check and answer them no matter the situation (vacation would fit here), the person with whom they are with, or where they are. Rush rush rush---work is always with you especially since you can now type and connect to the internet with your phone.
Glad your back---good holidays to you Tim
Monica

Tim Hodgens said...

K - thanks for stopping by. ...and it may be "worse" in the the northeast.

Monica - I agree with the cell phones. It shifted again (Dougald Hine talks about this as a "flex point" in technological development. cf. http://otherexcuses.blogspot.com/2007/12/fax-machines-and-invention-of-wheel.html) It started when the cell phones became commonplace, and then shifted to taking pictures and then shifted again to text messaging and accessing the internet.

The idea is to create connectivity but I guess their usage continues to expand because they make people feel more isolated and separated (and harried) the more they are used.

Each of these developments represent a picket in a very long picket fence extending back in time.

Anonymous said...

Slow down....wow what a concept. I think I need to add you to my blog list and, taking my time of course, read what all you have to say :)

Nice blog Tim.

Paul said...

Tim, I know I'm not being rational and objective -- in other words "I'm biased" -- but I wonder if the problem began with the anonymity of large cities. I recall some professor in seminary making a statement that Israel's problems began when they left their flocks and settled in cities. For some reason that statement caught my attention and I've wondered about the impact of large cities over small communities that have a connection to the land.

Tim Hodgens said...

Hi Paul, and welcome back from your daughter's wedding. I loved all of your posts about your trip and your insights.

I think you have accurately pointed out another picket in the picket fence.

Some day I would love to have a really good conversation with a cultural anthropologist and hear about what it was really like "back when." My understanding is that for reasons of support and protection and for "carrying capacity" of the land, that people formed up in small packs, maybe 10 - 20 people. Small groups. Then everything developed from there.

For a very interesting read when you get the time, take a look at The Parable of the Tribes by Andrew Bard Smookler ( http://nonesoblind.org/bio.html). (Based on some of our other conversations on evil in the world you will find his website and blog very interesting.)

Tim