Monday, July 16, 2007

I May Not See Everything - But I'm Not Blind

Part 1. (Long, long ago, and then just back a few generations )



Let's suppose that you were born in Shangri La and for your whole life that was all that you had ever known. Let's also say that virtually everyone you know has been swimming in the same wonderful sea of abundance and comfort. Now let's suppose that there are some rumblings which indicate that the world as you know it may not continue in the same way into the forseeable future. How would you deal with those rumblings? Would you amplify them, tune them in better, so you could look at their messages more directly and with greater clarity? Or would you let them remain as static which is an annoyance because it distracts from the comfort of Shangri La?

Given those two conditions you would have every right to expect that the wonderful world you have known would continue that way, since that is the way it has always been. That would be a fairly safe bet. You would hope that there would be minor variations in climate, etc. to help you know that it is not just a dream and to stress you somewhat just keep it interesting. But there would be no need to be concerned because you would have every good reason to believe that the party will just keep going on.

Would you highlight your inklings, even though they initially increase your sense of uncertainty and nibble at the picture of "everything's just fine," or would you send out even more invitations and, as they say: "Party on, Dude!"

Now imagine that in that happy valley where everything is lush green, and the temperature is always manageable, and where there is abundant food and water, and it's not too crowded that there is one pivotal change that happens gradually and progressively over a period of time. And let's say that one thing is a shift downwards in annual rainfall.

I was listening to something on NPR today about how that actually happened to a fun-loving and easy going group of people in Cape Verde, a collection of small islands off the west coast of Africa. For whatever reasons it essentially stopped raining there. And with that one central and pivotal development they simply couldn't grow their own food anymore. Then everything changed. It got to the point where, it was said, people were just passing out in the streets from lack of energy, the energy which comes from food which is based on the planting of seeds and timely application of soil and water and sunshine.

If it were not for aid from the world at large (whoever that was) and the relief from that, the people would have disappeared, from the slowness called starvation. A scary prospect for any individual, or family, or village. But a whole culture?


(It turns out that many of the Cape Verdeans left their land and settled elsewhere. They have kept alive the longing for their land and the spirit of their people and thankfully that lineage will continue in spite of their natural calamity.)


Part 2. (Contemporary Shangri La, and Contemporary Drought in Shangri La)

Here in the NorthEast we have been blessed with more than adequate rainfall for so long that we could almost take it for granted (although recently there has seemed to be more intensifications of downpours followed by dry spells than previously experienced by me in my 65+ years.) Nevertheless we continue to have more than adequate supplies, although we see bans on watering lawns more frequently. Yes, in our own Hundreth Town we live in another Shangri La, . We have been spared the "longing" of the Cape Verdeans; the longing for their way of being and their own abundance from when they had more than enough.

I give thanks regularly for the abundance which we have. But I also recognize the fragility of the whole which goes with it. When I look at the weather maps of our country and look at the rainfall amounts over the past few years in the drought areas of America, I am concerned about what could be.

It's a funny place to be. I know what we have, and what could develop if the having of that which we have come to take for granted were to evaporate before our eyes. Not rapidly, but slowly, much like watching paint dry. And I am reminded of the story of the frog in the pan of water. If the frog is placed in the pot of water and the water becomes suddenly hot, the frog will take appropriate action and jump. However, if the water is gradually heated, the frog gets used to it, and precipitous action is not called for, i.e., it's better to put up with the hot water which is known than to risk a move which will entail moving into the unknown.

Part 3; (What if instead of water, it was oil?)

Damn...this whole part just got lost in etherspace! I'll try to finish it tomorrow. But in the meantime look at a very important essay by Jeffrey Brown at The Oil Drum blog.

5 comments:

eboy said...

Hi Tim

I found your site the usual way jumping around. I am in my 40's and ever since I was a teenager whenever I went into a big grocery store. I was overcome with an uncomfortable feeling of impermanence. I mean the feeling that this can't last.
After many years of reading about nutrition and having just had a child some 10 years ago. I decided to leave the city and move to a farm to secure my own food and raise my children in a rural environment.
Suffice to say it was a great decision. I hope to live out the rest of my life in the country.

I have been pursuing self sufficiency and old time knowledge. Which I fear we are in danger of losing. With an oil restricted future. Unless you are wealthy I imagine the number of losers will rise precipitously.
The agri-business model assumes cheap fuel. The walmart / inventory on the road / just in time marketing model will fail.


Re your idea of interviewing people I have met some real neat old timers they are out there and a lot of them aren't in the cities.

Cheers
from Ontario.

arcolaura said...

Thanks for introducing me to Jeffrey Brown. I've subscribed to his "GraphOilogy" blog. Painful times coming, I'd say, but sometimes I think we will be better off if they come swiftly, so we come out with more biodiversity remaining for the future.

Dougald Hine said...

I'm right in the middle of reading Jared Diamond's 'Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive'. The Cape Verde story you tell echoes the stories from Easter Island, Chaco Canyon and elsewhere which he has studied. These precedents are frightening.

Anyway, it's good to know that others are thinking about all this.

Tim Hodgens said...

Eboy: Thanks for visiting and leaving a very interesting comment. I hope you continue to jump back in.

You have put your finger on one of the ingredients of the "inklings" I made reference to by referring to it as an awareness of impermanence. I think it was Einstein who said that reality was mostly an illusion, albeit a very persistent illusion.

Moving to the country has given you an interesting sense of time..."having just had a child some 10 years ago." :)

You are the first person to "nibble" on my interest to talk with people who have moved to what could be called a homesteading lifestyle. Perhaps you know some "old timers" who might be available for conversation, or even better, perhaps yourself?

If interested, you can email me (see my profile for my email address) or leave a comment.

Arcolaura: Hi. You make a very interesting comment when you speculate that the sudden change may open the possibility of more biodiversity remaining for the future. I'm going to have to think about that and will be curious to see if you want to elaborate in a post of your own on your blog.

Dougald: Interesting that you would open the discussion to how societies choose to fail (or survive.) In my Cape Verdean reference, did they choose to survive by having their own diaspora?

An further part of the NPR program was when it was mentioned that the Cape Verdeans who had moved away kept it all alive and vibrant through their longing, and in their music, drawing on the original tunes and rhythms and beats. But when some of those artists went back to visit, they found that the preference seemed to be more towards hip-hop. Curiouser and curiouser.

BTW, I read your posting this date about wounds and healing and the pain and embarrasment of the wound as the source of growth. I have to delve more deeply into what you said. Rich material there.

Maybe if the media could catch onto that it could provide a path away from all the posturing and pepsodent smilings and avoidance of real issues and possible solutions for national elections.

Thank you all for giving me sips of your fresh water.

Tim

Anonymous said...

I am willing to live without a lot of things and I do try to live a life of minimal inmpact, but it's frustraing as an individual. When you can't see the results of your good intentions, but you keep doing it in hope that it does indeed make a difference and you just can't see it.

Then I see people wasting 3x, what I have attempted to save and it just gets so frustrating.

We all suffer when several others are too arrogant to change their ways, and by the time they get the message, I fear it will be too late.
-P