Sunday, September 09, 2007

The Junkie's Last Fix

Until we deal with speed and energy - faster and more powerful - everything will propel us down the same road to depletion. Yes depletion; not just of values and the ability to take life at it's own pace, but also of earth's unreplenishible resources. Ironic, isn't it, experiencing speed and power can make us feel so alive, but it can also be so short sighted if we are borrowing our endowment or our reserves in order to make us feel alive so we can stay pumped up so we don't feel emptiness. Full and empty are both parts of the human condition and to try and deny either part is to throw the system out of significant balance.

Speed and rushing are such addictive patterns. Laura had a quote which I just love: "...and make the best life of enough-ness I can...."

When the junkie is at his or her most desperate, they will do things they never thought they would. We are blowing tops off mountains in the Appalachians. Tops of mountains leveled!

We are destroying tracts of land the size of Florida for some more of that stuff that allows us to propel a two thousand pound metal box at highway speeds, or to sit in traffic, in order to transport one person from here to there and back again, day in and day out.

The CIA tracks how much oil is consumed by various countries. Take a look at this pie chart - I wasn't able to copy and duplicate it in this post unfortunately. That pie is being eaten by a very big piggy.

And this is how one person talks about the junkie's addiction for oil:

"Now, (the story about the Tar Sands) wasn't easy to piece together. The press is almost universally in favor of anything that sounds like "more oil," no matter the cost. Nearly all we hear about is X billion in new investment announced by Y Company. We don't hear too much about the cancellations, delays and cost overruns. A full reckoning is rarely attempted.
But that's what we're here for.

So let's reckon this.

What we have here is arguably the most environmentally destructive activity man has ever attempted, with a compliant government, insatiable demand and an endless supply of capital turning it into "a speeding car with a gas pedal and no brakes." It sucks down critical and rapidly diminishing amounts of both natural gas and water, paying neither for its consumption of natural capital nor its environmental destruction, to the utter detriment of its host. And all to eke out maybe a 10% profit, if it turns out that the books haven't been cooked, and if the taxation structure remains a flat-out giveaway.

All of that, just to produce enough oil to offset the declining conventional oil production in the rest of Canada. Maybe.

And that, my friends, is what I call the oil junkie's last fix. An act of sheer desperation to stave off just a little longer that inevitable day when we are forced to realize that the fossil fuel game is truly over. No more rabbits in the hat. Done.

In the July 2006 issue of Rolling Stone, Al Gore called the tar sands "crazy," a huge waste of energy and an eyesore on the landscape of Western Canada. "For every barrel of oil they extract there, they have to use enough natural gas to heat a family's home for four days," Mr. Gore told the magazine. "And they have to tear up four tons of landscape, all for one barrel of oil. It is truly nuts. But you know, junkies find veins in their toes. It seems reasonable, to them, because they've lost sight of the rest of their lives."

This quote was taken from: Tar Sands: The Oil Junkie's Last Fix, Part 2 September 9, 2007 at: Theoildrum.com

I stand pat on my resolution: I will rush no more!

7 comments:

arcolaura said...

That's a rather shocking chart, but I notice that Canada's usage is pretty much proportional to that of the "very big piggy." In fact there is another chart linked in the sidebar there, usage per person, which shows that Canada comes in at a very close second. So I will keep trying to rush less, except that right now I'm in a very big rush to get our house walls closed in again before we have to turn the furnace on and start heating the great outdoors!

Paul said...

I noticed the US is #102 in the price of gas. Perhaps that's part of the problem. Gas appears to be cheap and we don't acknowledge the true costs.

Tim Hodgens said...

Laura,

I wonder if the consumption in the U.S. and Canada, is a reflection of the large distances that people routinely travel and the fact that there are also a gazillion cars in each country.

But that wouldn't fit when you look at the per capita usage in Belgium.

Hmmm...i wonder if it's a reflection of air transportation? And in the U.S. for the military?

I sent an email to Stoneleigh, the author of the 2 part report on Tar Sands and asked him if he had any idea what the breakdown of u.s. oil consumption is by sector of the economy...e.g., all trucking transportation, military usage, air transportation for people and material, etc.

Bonus points to him (or anyone else who can provide a pie diagram of that breakdown.

BTW, I hope your husband is doing much better.

Tim

Tim Hodgens said...

Paul,

That's a good point.

Two thoughts: 1. if gasonline prices jumped suddenly it would through the economy into an immediate tailspin, in my opinion.

And since two of the primary purposes of any government are to a) stay in office, and b) to keep people relatively quiet and accepting (appearances of contentment being one such process) then it behoves all parties to keep the prices low - but have you looked recently at how much of the price of gasoline goes towards federal and state taxes?

A few months ago the price of gasoling in Iran went up by pennies per gallon (and there they are accustomed to paying only pennies for a gallon of gasoline) and it created instant havoc with the population. I haven't heard anything further about that and I wonder if the situation was reversed or something else.

2. Well, I am sure my second point was something crucial and insightful, but I can't remember what it was.

oh well,

Tim

arcolaura said...

Thanks, Tim - he's doing fine. In fact, he is almost pain free, which means it is difficult for him to be patient with the regime of wearing a brace and moving carefully etc. But so far, he is taking it very well.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't the CIA have better things to do then make pie charts? :>

The King county council is planning to pass a resolution where they would tear up some railroad tracks to put in more bike trails. Normally this would sound like a good thing, but we already have an extensive paved bike trail that runs almost enitrely parellel to these tracks.

The other thing, is that these tracks run all the way from one end of puget sound to the other and only get one train at 3:58pm everyday. The route hits all the major city centers and moves past all the major choke points along our freeway systems.

Hello King co. Residents, wake up!!!! Commuter trains people, duh! There is a small group that is trying to bring this issue some awareness. It could be up and running in months, instead of just waiting around until the big billion dollar light rail project starts operations in 2012! It's so frustrating.

If those tracks get ripped up, it will just take more time and money to get a public transportation package approved and finished.
http://www.eastsiderailnow.org/

I hope they will be successful, if I can make time, I'd like to try and help them out.

-P

Steve Williams said...

Speed and energy (power) are seductive at a very powerful level. It's easy to blame advertising and marketing for the trend but I suspect there is something much deeper at work that makes it so effective.

Having machines that exhibit this is far easier than developing it inside ourselves. That's work.

Steve Williams
Scooter in the Sticks